AMD A6-3420M Vs E-350
Table : AMD A6-3420M Vs AMD E-350 Feature Differences
| Feature | AMD A6-3420M | AMD E-350 |
| Core Frequency | 1.5 GHz | 1.60 GHz |
| No. Of Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Cache Organization | 4 MB L2 cache | 2 x 512 KB |
| Turbo Frequency | 2.4 GHz | No Turbo |
| TDP Rating | 35 | 18 Watts |
| 64 Bit Support | Y | Y |
| Lithography | 32nm | 40 nm |
| Integrated Memory Controller | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Integrated Graphics | Radeon HD 6520G, 320 shaders, 400 MHz | Yes, HD 6310, 500 MHz |
Table : AMD A6-3420M Vs AMD E-350 Benchmarking Comparison
| Benchmarks | AMD A6-3420M | AMD E-350 |
| PassMark CPU Mark Score | 2284 | 735 |
| Super Pi 2M | Not avaailble | 111 seconds |
| 3D Mark 06 CPU | 2290 | 1010 |
| Windows 7 Experience Score | 6.7 | 3.8 |
Some more details of AMD A6-3420M
The AMD A6-3420M bumps up the clock frequency of A6-3400M by 100 MHz. This should make it better performing than many of the Core i3 Sandy Bridge processor and brings it closer to some of the Core i5 Sandy Bridge processors. The Integrated Graphics in the A6-3420M is much better than the Intel’s HD Graphics 3000 and supports DirectX11. A great graphics at low power could be the best reason for you to consider A6-3420M
Some more details of AMD E-350
AMD calls it Accelerated Processing Unit. The common persons still call it a processor. The E-350 is combines two processor cores and a graphics core in a single package that consumes low power and is highly suitable in the design of low cost ultra mobile netbooks and notebooks.
